If not – then you are missing a lot. Either way, James Gleick's “Genius” is a prerequisite, “a terrifically readable jewel-like biography” of one of. Richard Feynman is “half genius and half buffoon”, his colleague Freeman Dyson James Gleick, Richard Feynman: Leben und Werk des genialen Physikers. Genius: The Life and Science of. Richard Feynman, by James Gleick. From the author of the national bestseller Chaos comes an outstanding biography.
|Language:||English, Japanese, French|
|Genre:||Politics & Laws|
|ePub File Size:||29.52 MB|
|PDF File Size:||10.13 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration Required]|
Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick. Pantheon Press, New York, NY. pages. ISBN: $ Show all. 6SjY7YhG - Read and download James Gleick's book Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman in PDF, EPub, Mobi, site online. Free book. Editorial Reviews. bilgedumarre.ga Review. If you've read any of Richard Feynman's wonderful Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman by [Gleick, James ]. Audible Sample. Audible Sample. Playing Playing Loading Loading.
After a few such successes, the team placed their full faith in Feynman. The team found it rather easy to come up with the calculations required to build a bomb; it was dealing with the physical materials that presented the real challenge.
Feynman was no longer visualizing abstract scenarios. If the calculations for the melting point of a certain metal were even slightly off, it could spell death and nuclear disaster. And, as we all know, all this careful work bore fruit. Just before sunrise on July 16, , the sky over the New Mexico desert was set ablaze by the first detonation of an atomic bomb.
Some people say it takes between ten thousand to twenty thousand hours of practice to master a musical instrument. After all that time and work, the musician has an intuitive relationship with her instrument and improvising a melody becomes second nature — practically effortless. He could effortlessly translate a physical interaction into a formula, or vice versa, by visualizing an endless array of objects interacting across time and space.
Genius Key Idea #1: As a child, Richard Feynman was encouraged to think scientifically.
He admitted that he had no idea whether his students experienced similar visuals. In , Feynman made things a lot easier for students of quantum physics when he introduced his Feynman diagrams. It became immediately apparent that the diagrams he included in these findings introduced an ingeniously simplified way to understand complex equations.
This was especially the case for quantum physics, where his diagrams obviated the need for every academic article to include a series of painfully complex calculations. Nevertheless, Feynman had a hard time explaining his diagrams when he was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in It was the middle of the night in New York when the recipients were announced.
But, by dawn, reporters were at his door, asking him to explain his contribution to science.
Even though Feynman is recognized as a brilliant teacher, he did an impressive job of shirking his pedagogic duties. But those who did manage to attend one of the few classes he ever taught paid witness to something special. In his final university position, Feynman spent two years teaching the introductory course to physics at Caltech, providing an experience unlike any other.
Feynman took his students on a whirlwind tour through the world of physics, reimagining the entire field from his own unique perspective. Instead, he ensured that students understood concepts by encouraging them to visualize forces at work.
As the course went on, freshman and sophomore students struggled to keep up, and some dropped out. Since his classes were so fascinating, and since Feynman never wrote any books on his work, many people recognized the importance of transcribing his lectures. These notes were eventually published in a series of little red books entitled Feynman Lectures on Physics. Nevertheless, many of the professors who read them cited the books as being instrumental in reshaping their views on physics.
And we still use the tools he left behind to measure things such as the light that is emitted by an atom. He also gave us many of the analytical methods used by physicists today, methods that shape how judgments about experimental data are made. Genius Key Idea 7: Feynman cultivated a reputation as a joker, but his legacy is that of a truly original thinker.
There are a number of reasons Feynman is remembered. On the contrary, more often the slow-speaking Bethe tended to outcompute Feynman. Early in the project they were working together on a formula that required the square of Feynman reach across his desk for the Marchant mechanical calculator.
Bethe said. Don't you know how to take the square of numbers near fifty? Now my problem is this: I am not a great theoretical physicist, and what I did seems to me the most elementary and obvious thing to do. How could Bethe and Feynman possibly miss this, and Bethe give an explanation, according to Gleick, that is considerably more complicated?
Second problem. This is from a little further on in the book, and starts next to fairly abstruse looking so called Feynman diagrams, with paths sub-atomic particles would take.
Gleick gives what is presented as explanations and then writes, in the context of "Shrinking infinities" in path integrals and such - don't worry if it's beyond you : It meant that quantum mechanics produced good first approximations followed by a Sisyphean nightmare.
The harder a physicist pushed, the less accurate his calculations became. Such quantities as the mass of the electron became - of the theory were taken to its limit - infinite. The horror of this was hard to comprehend, and no glimmer of it appeared in popular accounts of science at the time. Yet it was not merely a theoretical knot. A pragmatic physicist eventually had to face it. Not being an expert I get infinity - unless It is not philosophy we are after, but the behavior of real things.
At this point, the first grew a bit too abstract to his taste; the latter was all but the perfect field for some with his understanding of equation and visualization capabilities. Unsurprisingly, at MIT, he excelled in this new discipline.
He hated art history and English and loathed music and philosophy. And he cheated really bad. So bad, in fact, that when he applied for a Princeton scholarship, he was nearly rejected, even though he attained a perfect score on the graduate school entrance exams in physics.
Needless to add — this was an unprecedented feat, which means that nobody between and had done it.
And, cheating aside, he got that Princeton scholarship — on the condition that he would not marry until obtaining a Ph. His high school sweetheart, however, was a poor girl, so she had to give — ah, the irony!
This wore her out, so she started feeling a bit sick at the time Feynman was acing his Princeton entrance exams. After a series of incompetent diagnoses, it was discovered that Arline had lymphatic tuberculosis — when it was already too late.
Genius: The Life And Science Of Richard Feynman Summary
In the meantime, he was recruited to work on the Manhattan Project, so he took Arline to a sanatorium in Albuquerque to be close to her and be able to visit her every weekend using the car of Klaus Fuchs yes, the guy who later turned out to have been an infiltrated Soviet spy.
Just two months before the United States dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan , Arline died. One and a half years later, after his father Melville left the world as well, Feynman wrote Arline a letter which is kind of difficult to read without wet eyes. You are real.
My darling wife, I do adore you. I love my wife. My wife is dead. In-between, Feynman would become a legendary professor, a joker, and a Nobel Prize winner. Supposedly, when the press awakened him at 3: And that event sums up brilliantly the life of a man as exceptional as any.It became immediately apparent that the diagrams he included in these findings introduced an ingeniously simplified way to understand complex equations.
Though, that may have been a sign in itself — after all, Einstein was a late talker as well. One and a half years later, after his father Melville left the world as well, Feynman wrote Arline a letter which is kind of difficult to read without wet eyes. His books have been translated into 30… More about James Gleick. I've got a paperback version, published by Vintage Books in , pages in all, thoroughly researched, it would seem, and glowingly reviewed. If you do, then you need no reason to read ahead.
Feynman was no longer visualizing abstract scenarios. When Feynman applied to Princeton for graduate studies, he was nearly rejected. Genius by James Gleick inquiries tutorial entire individuals history with study guidebook dummies integrating all chapters gratis, sparknotes author, component introduction.